--

ChatGPt says “The offer by Donald Trump to eliminate all environmental restrictions in exchange for $1 billion from oil and gas executives raises significant legal and ethical concerns. U.S. election laws prohibit quid pro quo arrangements where campaign contributions are explicitly tied to specific policy promises. Such actions could be considered a violation of campaign finance laws and corruption statutes, and would likely face intense scrutiny and legal challenges if pursued [oai_citation:1,President Biden’s Environmental Record – State of the Planet](https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2023/06/05/president-bidens-environmental-record/) .”

So why isn’t it being pursued? Who needs to pursue it?

ChatGPT again “If Donald Trump made such an offer, it would be the responsibility of federal agencies like the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate potential violations of campaign finance laws and corruption statutes. Additionally, watchdog organizations and congressional committees could pursue inquiries and demand accountability. If evidence of wrongdoing is found, legal action could be taken to address the violations and ensure compliance with the law.”

--

--

Anthony (Tony/Pcunix) Lawrence 👀
Anthony (Tony/Pcunix) Lawrence 👀

Written by Anthony (Tony/Pcunix) Lawrence 👀

Retired Unix Consultant. I write tech and humor mostly but sometimes other things. See my Lists if your interests are specific.

Responses (1)