I tried it on today's post.

, ' ? , " " , . , , , ' . . . ' , " " , . . " " , , , , , . . , ' - > - > - > . , ' . " " . " " " " ' , ' . ' , , . , . ' ? , . ' ' , . . , ' . ? , . . - ' . , ' . . . ' , ' ' ? . . . , . ' , . , . ? ' , ' ? , , ?

Which is pretty much the point I wanted to make, but less wordy.